Razionalità assiologica e disincantamento del mondo. Nuove interpretazioni dell’Entzauberung weberiano / Leonardo Allodi en Acta Philosophica, v.29, n.2 (2020)

Público ISBD [artículo]  inActa Philosophica > v.29, n.2 (2020) . - p. 313-329 Título : Razionalità assiologica e disincantamento del mondo. Nuove interpretazioni dell’Entzauberung weberiano Tipo de documento: texto impreso Autores: Leonardo Allodi Fecha de publicación: 2020 Artículo en la página: p. 313-329 Idioma : Italiano Temas: FILOSOFIA RACIONALIDAD SPAEMANN, ROBERT WEBER, MAX Resumen: How do Max Weber’s works deal with “the philosophical problem of our time”, that is, the claim to define a field, both in society and in history, in which an action different from the zweckrational type can and must exist? And, within it, what role does a “non-consequentialist” conception of axiological rationality play? There is an “implicit text” in Weber’s writings which can be understood from the perspectives of M. Scheler, L. Strauss, R. Boudon. And, in particular, from the very recent interpretations by R. Spaemann and H. Jonas on the concept of “disenchantment of the world”. “With Weber and beyond Weber” implies to acknowledge in advance that the question on the “normativity of reality” is preeminent insofar it allows to overcome the split between “facts and values”, which ultimately does not allow us to understand how “the reality of the fact cannot be separate from its quality” (R. Aron). Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96701 [artículo] Razionalità assiologica e disincantamento del mondo. Nuove interpretazioni dell’Entzauberung weberiano [texto impreso] / Leonardo Allodi . - 2020 . - p. 313-329. Idioma : Italiano in Acta Philosophica > v.29, n.2 (2020) . - p. 313-329 Temas: FILOSOFIA RACIONALIDAD SPAEMANN, ROBERT WEBER, MAX Resumen: How do Max Weber’s works deal with “the philosophical problem of our time”, that is, the claim to define a field, both in society and in history, in which an action different from the zweckrational type can and must exist? And, within it, what role does a “non-consequentialist” conception of axiological rationality play? There is an “implicit text” in Weber’s writings which can be understood from the perspectives of M. Scheler, L. Strauss, R. Boudon. And, in particular, from the very recent interpretations by R. Spaemann and H. Jonas on the concept of “disenchantment of the world”. “With Weber and beyond Weber” implies to acknowledge in advance that the question on the “normativity of reality” is preeminent insofar it allows to overcome the split between “facts and values”, which ultimately does not allow us to understand how “the reality of the fact cannot be separate from its quality” (R. Aron). Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96701

---

page 1/1