A partir de esta página puede:
Volver a la pantalla de inicio con las estanterías virtuales... | Su cuenta | Ayuda |
Información del autor
Autor Francesco Panizzoli |
Documentos disponibles escritos por este autor
Refinar búsqueda
Alcune aporie della “necessità della contingenza”. Una lettura critica del realismo speculativo di Quentin Meillassoux / Francesco Panizzoli en Acta Philosophica, v.29, n.2 (2020)
[artículo]
Título : Alcune aporie della “necessità della contingenza”. Una lettura critica del realismo speculativo di Quentin Meillassoux Tipo de documento: texto impreso Autores: Francesco Panizzoli Fecha de publicación: 2020 Artículo en la página: p. 415-429 Idioma : Italiano Temas: FILOSOFIA
REALISMOResumen: Meillassoux’s speculative realism is aporetic in its outcome in two ways. 1) It should lead to the abandonment of the concepts of ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ because of the principle: “only contingency is necessary”. If it is a principle of being (and not of thought), than there is only the reality, the only absolute, in which ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ have no meaning. 2) If there are no reasons for the existence of things, than there isn’t any “foundation”. But therefore: why the IperCaos? So the Meillassoux’s speculative realism seems not to be so “strong” and “new”, but it is like an “old” rationalism. Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96707
in Acta Philosophica > v.29, n.2 (2020) . - p. 415-429[artículo] Alcune aporie della “necessità della contingenza”. Una lettura critica del realismo speculativo di Quentin Meillassoux [texto impreso] / Francesco Panizzoli . - 2020 . - p. 415-429.
Idioma : Italiano
in Acta Philosophica > v.29, n.2 (2020) . - p. 415-429
Temas: FILOSOFIA
REALISMOResumen: Meillassoux’s speculative realism is aporetic in its outcome in two ways. 1) It should lead to the abandonment of the concepts of ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ because of the principle: “only contingency is necessary”. If it is a principle of being (and not of thought), than there is only the reality, the only absolute, in which ‘contingenty’ and ‘necessity’ have no meaning. 2) If there are no reasons for the existence of things, than there isn’t any “foundation”. But therefore: why the IperCaos? So the Meillassoux’s speculative realism seems not to be so “strong” and “new”, but it is like an “old” rationalism. Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=96707