A partir de esta página puede:
Volver a la pantalla de inicio con las estanterías virtuales... | Su cuenta | Ayuda |
Información del autor
Autor Roberto Di Ceglie |
Documentos disponibles escritos por este autor
Refinar búsqueda
Il problema della divine hiddenness alla prova del concetto di dio / Roberto Di Ceglie en Acta Philosophica, v.30, n.2 (2021)
[artículo]
Título : Il problema della divine hiddenness alla prova del concetto di dio Tipo de documento: texto impreso Autores: Roberto Di Ceglie Fecha de publicación: 2021 Artículo en la página: p. 343-358 Idioma : Italiano Temas: DIOS
EXISTENCIA
FILOSOFIA
SCHELLENBERG, JOHN (1959-)Resumen: Divine Hiddenness and the Concept of God - In contemporary debates, the problem of divine hiddenness can be numbered among the most prominent atheistic arguments. In this essay, I focus on a widely discussed version of this argument, i.e., the one developed by John Schellenberg (1959-). He bases the version at stake on a concept of God as an omnipotent, morally perfect, and ontologically perfect being. I argue that the way he develops his argument is simply inconsistent with each of these concepts. As a result, Schellenberg’s version of the divine hiddenness argument proves to be implausible. Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=101193
in Acta Philosophica > v.30, n.2 (2021) . - p. 343-358[artículo] Il problema della divine hiddenness alla prova del concetto di dio [texto impreso] / Roberto Di Ceglie . - 2021 . - p. 343-358.
Idioma : Italiano
in Acta Philosophica > v.30, n.2 (2021) . - p. 343-358
Temas: DIOS
EXISTENCIA
FILOSOFIA
SCHELLENBERG, JOHN (1959-)Resumen: Divine Hiddenness and the Concept of God - In contemporary debates, the problem of divine hiddenness can be numbered among the most prominent atheistic arguments. In this essay, I focus on a widely discussed version of this argument, i.e., the one developed by John Schellenberg (1959-). He bases the version at stake on a concept of God as an omnipotent, morally perfect, and ontologically perfect being. I argue that the way he develops his argument is simply inconsistent with each of these concepts. As a result, Schellenberg’s version of the divine hiddenness argument proves to be implausible. Enlace permanente a este registro: https://opac.um.edu.uy/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=101193